Oct 5

Why should you consider using a Strapless Heart Rate monitor watch?

I took up competitive running later in life and started with a marathon as my goal. I took advice from various distance coaches and they recommended using a heart rate monitor as part of my training. I have now been using heart rate monitors since 1998. My first HRM was just a chest strap and a digital readout of the heart rate. I think it was a Polar heart rate monitor. I still had to wear a running watch on the other wrist to measure my time!

Technology has moved on and now they have strapless heart rate monitor watches that monitor your time and heart rate without the need for a chest strap.

Here is an article about Strapless Heart Rate Monitor Watch training

Strapless Heart Rate Monitor - All the Gain, None of the Pain!
By [http://ezinearticles.com/?expert=Matt_Ream]Matt Ream

There are pros and cons you must consider when purchasing a strapless heart rate monitor. As you know, “traditional” heart rate monitors use a chest strap to take real time heart rate readings and transmit them to a watch or other recording/display device.

Strapless heart rate monitors, on the other hand, are just what they say. They did not require the use of a chest strap to give you heart rate information. They use sensitive electrodes on the face of the watch upon which the user places his or her fingers to take a reading.

Wearing a chest strap can be somewhat cumbersome, uncomfortable, and can slip out of position, leaving you no longer get any heart rate readings. It is also usually necessary to voice of the electrodes with something like an electrode cream, water, or saliva. The main benefit of using a heart rate monitor with a chest strap is that the readings that you are getting are constant and immediate.

When using a strapless heart rate monitor, the user has to take action in order to get a reading. That means if the person is running, for example, they may need to slow down or stop to place their fingers on the electrode buttons. Doing that means they have already lost some of their maximum heart rate as the heart begins to recover from the effort.

Despite that, the benefits of a strapless heart rate monitor are many. You don’t have the discomfort of wearing a strap (which are normally made of hard plastic), you don’t have to continually moisten anything, it is easier to get started with your exercise.

You can also wear the unit just as a sports watch or irregular watch, with the added advantage that you can take your heart rate measurement at any time throughout the day. If you’re sitting in a meeting, you can quietly monitor your heart rate to ensure you’re not getting too stressed.

Our choice for the best strapless heart rate monitor is the Reebok Impulse. It’s a reasonably priced unit packed with features. Those features include heart rate measurement, heart rate memory and recall, and lowest/highest heart rate readings. It also has sports watch functionality including chronograph, 42 lap memory, countdown timer, and a pacer mode. You can even use it as a normal watch because it includes time of day, a daily alarm, the dual time zone functions.

When making the decision of what type of heart rate monitor to purchase, consider how you will use it throughout the day. The benefit of a strapless heart rate monitor is that if you are already wearing a watch, no extra equipment is necessary to measure your heart rate. You will find yourself using it more often, because it is simpler and easier to use than a traditional heart rate monitor with chest strap.

A [http://www.rypsports.com/impulse.html]strapless heart rate monitor will set you free. You can exercise anywhere and everywhere without the cumbersome hassle of carrying or wearing an uncomfortable strap across your chest. Learn more at http://www.rypsports.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Matt_Ream [http://ezinearticles.com/?Strapless-Heart-Rate-Monitor---All-the-Gain,-None-of-the-Pain!&id=414519 ]http://EzineArticles.com/?Strapless-Heart-Rate-Monitor—All-the-Gain,-None-of-the-Pain!&id=414519

Technorati Tags:

Sep 8

I would like to find a bicycle with a built-in computer with sensors in the hand-grips (similar to those on some work-out exercise cycles found in health clubs) that provides feedback on heart rate, calorie burn, distance covered and average speed. I wonder if such a bicycle could include sattelite navigation>

the only bikes with builtin computers are usually stationary exercise bikes
you will need to buy these things and install them on your bike
Garmin makes the best GPS systems, and some are integrated with the other info (ie. mph, cadence, heartrate, etc.)
plan on spending 300 to 500 if you want absolutely everything that is available

Sep 6

Im taking a 45 min spin/cycle class for beginner/intermediates and im wondering how I can tell how many calories im buring during that class, also I have a hr monitor- is there a way based on my heart rate to find the calories burned???
i have a heart rate monitor -i said that above, how do i tell from that?
does anyone here take spin classes, how do you think its better or worse than tredmill- same time & distance & all??

Get a heart rate monitor - that's the most accurate way to tell.

You can also try www.caloriesperhour.com which will tell you how many calories you can burn doing certain exercises, but it's just a guesstimate based on your height/weight/age. HRM is the way to go. I have a Polar F6 and love it.

Sep 5

My husband is 30 years old and has hemocromatosis (high iron blood disorder) This is the results of his holter monitor that he wore for 24 hours. Can any work out what it is saying?

Heart Rates, Min was 37 bpm at 3am, Maximum was at 183bpm at 5.30am. 1323 Beats in Tachycardia, 6744 beats in bradycardia - 1.84 seconds MAX R-R at 2.50am.

Superventriculars (S,J,A) - 321 isolated, 2 Couplets, 202 Bigeminal Cycles, 19 Runs totalling 131 beats, 35 beats longest run 102 bpm at 5.25am. 7 Beats fatest run at 160bpm at 5.23am.

Venticulars - 1 isolated, 0 couplets, 0 bigeminal cycles, 0 running totaling o beats.

The tachycardia listed above was factitious as the software frequently read tall T waves adn R waves or SVE's.

Does anyone have any ideas what these numbers mean?

Thanks for you opinion!

I will do my best

slowest HR is 37 beats per minute
fastest HR was 183 beats per minute

normal HR for adults 60-100
although it may be normal for someone to have a lower or higher HR without meaning something is wrong.

HR below 60 is bradycardia
HR above 100 is tachycardic

He had 1323 beats that were above the rate of 100 beats per minute

6744 beats with a HR below 60

R-R means the tracing that the monitor produces, the highest or lowest (depending on which lead the tracing is being read in) point of the heartbeat 1.84 seconds is the time elapsed between the two R waves, thus measuring the HR

supraventricular- means originating from above the ventricals

He had 321 isolated (PAC) premature atrial contractions
2 couplets meaning a pair or two consectutive PAC's ( normal beat, fast beat, fast beat)
202 bigeminal cycles ( normal beat, fast beat, normal beat, fast beat…….)
19 runs totaling 131 beats ( a run is three or more consective not normal beats) in your husbands case out of the 19 runs the abnormal beats totaled 131 beats
35 abnormal ( fast in your husbands case) consectutive beats in a row was the longest run
During the fastest run the HR got as high as 160 beats per minute

Ventriculars- is a wider complex rhythm and originates lower in the heart that generally result in a slower HR but not always

your husband had only one premature ventricular beat

It goes on to read that the results of the tachycardia were not real due to the machine picking up the T wave reading as a R wave, as I explained the R wave is the tallest point of the EKG reading and if the T wave ( the hump that follows after the R wave) is amplified for some reason ( bad hookup, lead position, machine misreading, or body movement) it will read the HR wrong and sometimes the rhythm.

I hope this helps

Sep 4

The stationary type. So what do I look for when I buy one (apart from the price). I need something that monitors heart rate OR pulse rate, BUT what else should I be looking for??
Do we get folding cycles out there for storage? (coz space is a bit of an issue)…

Do you have back or knee problems? If so, you might want to compare the fit and shape of the bicycle. A more recumbent bike (where you sit like a chair) will be easier on your back. A bike where you lean forward more will allow you to go faster and get a better workout but it undoubtedly puts more strain on the lower back. I personally prefer more recumbent bikes.
Also, the knee should never be straight, always bent even all the way around when you pedal. There's a good picture of this in the link below.

Sep 3

I have now been to three different GPs about my weight gain but none of them will take me seriously. I am a 27 year old female, 164 cm, and I weighed 54-55 kilos this time last year.
Since then I have started gaining weight really rapidly and now weight 68-70 kilos. I have been exercising regularly (3-4 times of high intensity activity a week - I have a Polar heart rate monitor to keep track of what I do) and I watch what I eat but it makes no difference.
I started taking the antidepressant drug Zoloft shortly before this weight gain started. I'm sure this is what must be causing it. But the doctors all say 'no no, you just need to eat better and exercise more'. ARGH! Idiots! Consequently I stopped the antidepressant anyway, about a month ago, but have still put on another kilo in that time.
I just don't know what to do! Is there something I should be demanding of my doctors? Should they be testing for something. And is there anything I can do to stop it in terms of medications?

Zolft can cause you to gain weight that is a known fact. if you are eating right and exercising like you say the weight should be coming off though.

two other reasons for the weight gain might be a thyroid problems - a blood test can check for that.
and PolyCystic Ovary Syndrom which is very common among women in you age group. this can be found by using Ultasound. It causes your body to store fat and not burn calories correctly and also you might have noticed a change in your periods.

just two thoughts.

Sep 3

I am a45 year old female who weighs 159lbs and I'm 5'6" and a UK size 14. I have been going to the gym for the past six weeks, three mornings a week, walking 6.3kmh for 40-60 minutes, recliner cycling for 20minutes at 78-83rpm acheiving 4km in approx 12-20minutes and then a short regime of weights for arms, legs and shoulders and then swimming thirty lengths of a 20 metre pool. I also go to an hour of Pilates one hour a week to tone up. I haven't reduced my calorie intake ASWELL as doing this exercise as I have yoyo dieted for years and what to get off that treadmill. This time I wanted to reduce by upping the exercise. I wear a heart rate monitor and know I don't cheat so why aren't I losing weight or inches? Any ideas? Thank-you.

Sometimes if you exercise alot and more than you are use to doing it will cause you to gain muscle. You have probably lost weight but are adding muscle so it doesn't seem like you are losing anything. If you keep up at the rate you are going you will definitlely see a difference soon.

Sep 2

My friend and I are working on a school project and we decided to do it on a watch having to do with health care. Any suggestions would be nice. We aren't 100% sure what to do it on but we were thinking of an advanced medical watch for diabetics, Alzheimer's, hearing impaired, seniors, heart attacks, strokes, asthma and that had info on the patient, told the time and date (of course), told the heart rate blood sugar, had a button to alert ambulance, had a GPS system. Maybe for athletics too? Pretty much a crazy computer in a watch. What else to add though..we need to add some more really good healthcare things? It's a crazy future watch. The idea sounds crazy but maybe not in the future O_O!

this could be a really great tool for diabetics with poorly controlled blood sugar. it could alert them when their sugar gets too high so that they don't forget to take their medicines. also, if it could have a chip in it with memory, it could be a really helpful tool for the doctors of diabetic patients so that the doctors could observe patterns in the patients blood glucose relative to meals, activities, sleep, etc.

Sep 2

In your experience which is more effective & in what ways? Also Is there a way to estimate calories burned based on your heart rate monitor?

The one you enjoy most will work best for you. Your more likely to do it.

Cycling does it for me I use it for transport, to get out of the house and to sticky beak around the neighborhood. It is also easier on the joints. Riding to a regular destination helps to stick at it.

There is an algorithm to calculate calories used from heart rate. It is quite complicated and not very accurate. You need to know, your height, weight, body mass index, your temperature, ambient temperature, Ambient pressure, height above sea level etc etc etc.

Many heart rate monitors have a simplified calorie counter built in. (if you want a guide.)

My tip is to concentrate on enjoying what you are doing. The weight comes off just the same. Doing calculations and computations doesn't burn many calories at all.

Sep 1

I need a running watch that will tell me distance, and if possible pace. I'd also like it to have a heart rate monitor. I really can't spend above $50, so that rules out any GPS watch. Any recommendations?

here's one that is just barely over $50:

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000221VO0?smid=A1KI2TR7SI3MAO&tag=nextag-sports-mp-20&linkCode=asn

here's another one that's even cheaper, though it only gives you your heart rate:

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00185IXJ6?smid=A2VA8L9MTC3XM2&tag=nextag-hpc-20&linkCode=asn

hope this helps! =)

« Previous Entries